苗琨.成人暴发性心肌炎不同治疗方案差异分析[J].内科急危重症杂志,2017,23(6):465-468
扫码阅读全文
|
DOI:10.11768/nkjwzzzz20170607 |
中文关键词: 暴发性心肌炎 成人 生命支持 治疗方案 |
英文关键词: |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 1791 |
全文下载次数: 2836 |
中文摘要: |
目的:调查成人暴发性心肌炎(FM)的临床特点及不同治疗方式对预后的影响,为临床诊治及预后评估提供参考。方法:回顾性分析83例成人FM患者的临床资料。根据治疗方式分为传统治疗组(47例)和生命支持治疗组(36例)。统计不同治疗方案与终点事件(院内死亡、存活患者的住院时间)的差异。结果:传统治疗组院内病死率明显高于生命支持治疗组(59.6% vs 5.6%,P<0.01),且生命支持组患者平均住院时间较普通治疗组有所减少(12.5d vs 14d, P<0.05)。结论:成人FM患者应尽早采取“以生命支持为依托的综合治疗方案”进行救治。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective: To investigate the clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with fulminant myocarditis (FM). Methods: The clinical data of 83 adults with FM were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment, these patients were classified into two groups: traditional treatment group (n=47) and life support treatment group (n=36). The association between endpoints (in-hospital death and hospital stay of the surviving patients) and the different treatments was analyzed. Results: The in-hospital mortality in traditional treatment group was significantly higher than that in life support treatment group ( 59.6% vs 5.6%, P<0.01). The average time of hospitalization in life support group was shorter than traditional treatment group (12.5d vs 14d,P<0.05). Conclusions: Patients with FM should be treated with life support-based comprehensive treatment regimen as early as possible. |
|