• 四种危重症评分对急诊重症监护室脓毒症合并急性肾损伤患者预后的评估价值
  • Evaluation value of four critical illness scores in patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury in the emergency intensive care unit
  • 扫码阅读全文 本文二维码信息
    DOI:
    中文关键词:  危重症评分  急诊重症监护室  脓毒症合并急性肾损伤  预后
    英文关键词:Critical illness score  Emergency intensive care unit  Sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury  Prognosis
    基金项目:
    作者单位邮编
    焦小英 苏州市第九人民医院 215200
    潘瑜 苏州市第九人民医院 215200
    陆佳丽 苏州市第九人民医院 215200
    戴陈 苏州市第九人民医院 215200
    陈佳娟 苏州市第九人民医院 215200
    张丽霞 苏州市第九人民医院 
    摘要点击次数: 49
    全文下载次数: 0
    中文摘要:
          目的:探讨四种危重症评分对急诊重症监护室(EICU)脓毒症合并急性肾损伤(AKI)患者预后的评估价值。方法:选择本院EICU收治的102例脓毒症合并AKI患者为研究对象,根据AKI分期标准分为Ⅰ期(n=36)、Ⅱ期(n=39)和Ⅲ期(n=27),依据入院28 d患者的存活情况分为存活组(n=60)及死亡组(n=42)。入住EICU当天进行急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ评分(APACHEⅡ)和序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、改良早期预警评分系统(MEWS)、急诊脓毒症死亡风险评分(MEDS),采用Logistic回归分析脓毒症合并AK1患者死亡的影响因素,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析各评分对死亡的预测价值。结果:不同AKI分期患者的APACHEⅡ、SOFA、MEWS及MEDS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。死亡组APACHEⅡ、SOFA、MEWS及MEDS评分明显高于存活组(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ、SOFA、MEWS及MEDS评分是脓毒症合并AKI患者死亡的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,APACHEⅡ、SOFA、MEWS及MEDS评分预测死亡的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.779、0.810、0.831和0.907,且MEDS评分的AUC明显高于APACHEⅡ评分(Z=2.371,P=0.018)。结论:APACHEⅡ、SOFA、MEWS及MEDS评分均能较好的预测脓毒症合并AKI患者的预后,但MEDS评分明显优于APACHEⅡ评分。
    英文摘要:
          Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of four critical illness scores in patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in the emergency intensive care unit (EICU). Methods: 102 patients with sepsis complicated with AKI admitted to EICU of our hospital were selected as the study objects, and were divided into stage Ⅰ (n=36), stage Ⅱ (n=39), and stage Ⅲ (n=27) according to the AKI staging criteria. According to the 28-day survival after admission, the patients were divided into the survival group (n=60) and the death group (n=42). Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, modified early warning score (MEWS), and emergency sepsis mortality risk score (MEDS) were performed on the day of admission to the EICU. Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of death in sepsis patients with AK1, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive value of each score for death. Results: There were significant differences in APACHEⅡ, SOFA, MEWS and MEDS scores among patients with different AKI stages (P<0.05). The APACHEⅡ, SOFA, MEWS and MEDS scores of the death group were significantly higher than those of the survival group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that APACHEⅡ, SOFA, MEWS and MEDS scores were independent risk factors for death in sepsis patients with AKI (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of APACHEⅡ score, SOFA score, MEWS score and MEDS score for predicting death was 0.779、0.810、0.831 and 0.907, and the AUC of MEDS score was significantly higher than that of APACHEⅡ score (Z=2.371, P=0.018). Conclusion: APACHEⅡ, SOFA, MEWS and MEDS scores can predict the prognosis of sepsis patients with AKI, but the MEDS score is significantly better than the APACHEⅡ score.